Lepomis auritus
redbreast sunfish
Type Locality
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
(Linnaeus 1758 in Eschmeyer 1990).
Etymology/Derivation of Scientific Name
Lepomis: scaled
operculum; auritus: eared, in reference to the elongate opercular
flap (Ross 2001).
Synonymy
Labrus auritus
Linnaeus 1758:283 in Eschmeyer 1990.
Characters
Maximum size: 241 mm
TL (Carlander 1977).
Coloration: Back dark
brown or olive, with sides lighter olive and belly yellow (in females) or
reddish (in males). Dorsal, anal, and caudal fins dusky and sometimes
reddish (Ross 2001). Opercular membrane dark to its margin (Hubbs et al.
1991). Belly of breeding males orange-red, flanks flecked with red, median
fins blue-green to olive, and lips pale blue (Ross 2001). Peritoneum
colorless (Goldstein and Simon 1999).
Counts: Fewer than 55
lateral line scales [Ross (2001) lists 41-50]; 3 anal spines (rarely 2 or
4); 6-13 dorsal fin spines; 6 or 7 brachiostegals (Hubbs et al. 1991); 10-11
(9-12) dorsal rays; 9-11 anal rays; 13-15 pectoral rays (Ross 2001).
Body shape: Body
depth usually contained two to two and one-half times in standard length
(Hubbs et al. 1991). Elongate for sunfishes (Ross 2001).
Mouth position:
Terminal, somewhat oblique (Goldstein and Simon 1999).
External morphology:
Opercle produced into a thin flexible projection lying within the opercular
membrane; posterior edge of opercle within opercular membrane fimbriate;
pectoral fins short and rounded; pectoral fin contained 3.75 or more times
in standard length; supramaxilla absent or shorter than breadth of maxilla;
maxillary width less than suborbital; scales ctenoid; lateral line present (Hubbs
et al. 1991).
Internal morphology:
Villiform teeth present on palatines, vomer, premaxillary, and dentary (Hubbs
et al. 1991; Ross 2001). Intestine well differentiated; pyloric caeca
present (Goldstein and Simon 1999).
Distribution (Native and Introduced)
U.S. distribution:
Occurs naturally in the southeastern United States along the Atlantic Slope
drainages from New Brunswick and Maine south to central Florida and west
along the Gulf of Mexico Coast to the Apalachicola and Choctawhatchee Rivers
in western Florida. It had been widely introduced outside of its native
range, especially in Texas and Louisiana (Lee 1980; Ross 2001), and has been
reported from the Black Warrior River drainage in Alabama (Mettee et al.
1989).
Texas distribution:
Introduced from its original range of the streams of the Atlantic slope,
this species now occurs throughout the eastern and southern parts of the
state as far west as Independence Creek (Pecos Drainage; Hubbs et al. 1991).
Species seemed to be restricted to Falcon Reservoir (lower Rio Grande River;
Edwards and Contreras-Balderas 1991). Garrett et al. (2004) reported
Lepomis auritus rarely collected from Pinto Creek (Kinney Co.), Texas.
Abundance/Conservation status (Federal, State, NGO):
Populations in the southern
United States are currently stable (Warren et al. 2000).
Habitat Associations
Macrohabitat: Tends to
be more of a river species than other Lepomis (Lee 1980). Occupy
streams as well as lakes and reservoirs, often being found in cool lakes
that also support trout (Carlander 1977). They are particularly common in
established beaver ponds (Levine et al. 1986).
Mesohabitat: In
western Florida, habitats range from sand-bottom creeks to highly vegetated
sloughs (Hellier 1967). Found in cool, upland streams, but are also found in
lower reaches of rivers, examples being the tidally influenced areas of the
Chickahominy River in Virginia (Richmond 1940) and lower reaches of the
Suwannee River in Florida (Bass and Hitt 1975). In Texas, this species was
present in upstream and downstream collections from Canyon Reservoir (Comal
Co.), but appeared to be negatively impacted in the cold downstream waters
(change in water temperature due to hypolimnion water releases; Edwards
1978). In the Devils River, Texas, Cichlasoma cyanoguttatum with
Lepomis auritus, was one of only three species associations that existed
pre-flood, and remained post-flood (Harrell 1978).
Biology
Spawning season:
Occurs in the spring, from April - October at water temperatures of
16.8-25.6°C; peak spawning activity
during late spring and summer (Davis 1972; Bass and Hitt 1975).
Spawning location:
Nests are solitary, usually adjacent to logs or some other structure; nests
range from 30-94 cm in diameter, are 15-20 cm deep at center, and are
usually constructed over sand (Miller 1964; Davis 1972).
Reproductive strategy:
Only centrarchid not producing sound during courtship (Gerald 1971). Once
spawning occurs, males guard nest area from potential predators (Breder
1936).
Fecundity: Females
produce an average of 3302 eggs, with a range of 322-9206, depending on
their body size. Mature ova average 1.2 mm in diameter (Sandow et al. 1975).
Age./size at maturation:
2nd year of life, at sizes of 75-102 mm TL (Carlander 1977;
Sandow et al 1975; Levine et al. 1986).
Migration:
Longevity: May live to
7 years, though older age classes tend to have more males than females
(Levine et al. 1986; Sandow et al. 1975).
Food habits:
Goldstein and Simon (1999) list main food items as immature aquatic insects;
first and second level trophic classifications for species are invertivore,
and drift, respectively; trophic mode: water column. Observed to be
opportunistic feeders. Major prey includes aquatic insects (especially
dipteran larvae), beetles, large mayfly and dragonfly larvae, and
crustaceans such as crayfishes (Flemer and Woolcott 1966; Davis 1972; Coomer
et al. 1977; Cooner and Bayne 1982).In beaver bond habitats, dipteran larvae
(chironomids and ceratopogonids) and microcrustaceans (copepods and
cladocerans) were the most commonly occurring prey, although mayflies, small
fishes and dragonfly larvae made up more of the diet by volume (Levine et
al. 1986). In tidally influenced reaches of rivers, fish also feed on
various crab species, including blue and fiddler crabs (Bass and Hitt 1974).
With increasing size, fish consume larger quantities of terrestrial insects
(Cooner and Bayne 1982).
Growth: Fish average
41-59 mm TL after their first year, and 75-90 mm, 102-125 mm, 128-153 mm,
147-181 mm, 205 mm, and 222 mm TL for ages 2-7 respectively (Levine et al.
1986; Sandow et al. 1975)
Phylogeny and morphologically similar fishes
Most similar to the longear (Lepomis
megalotis) and green (L. cyanellus) sunfishes. It differs from
L. cyanellus in having a smaller mouth and short, versus long, gill
rakers. It differs from L. megalotis in having a shallower body depth
for a given length (although in both species relative body depth increases
with increasing fish size), and in having the width of the opercular flap
narrower than the eye diameter. It differs from both L. megalotis and
L. cyanellus in lacking a light border around the edge of the
opercular flap (Ross 2001). Wainwright and Lauder (1992) placed L.
auritus as sister taxon to a clade which, among other species, includes
the following found in Texas: L. microlophus, L. macrochirus,
L. marginatus, and L. megalotis. Mabee (1993) considered L.
auritus to be the sister taxon to L. megalotis.
Host Record
Posthodiplostomum minimum,
Spinitectus carolini, S. micracanthus, and S. gracilis
reported from Lepomis auritus in the upper San Marcos River, Texas
(Underwood and Dronen 1984). Trematoda (2), Nematoda (1), Acanthocephala
(1), Leech (1), Crustacea (1; Hoffman 1967).
Commercial or Environmental
Importance
Important
sportfish in native range along Atlantic coastal drainages. Ross (2001)
recommends that no further introductions of this species be made into
Mississippi, due to the potential for negative impact on native sunfishes or
other native fish species. In Texas, Lepomis auritus is one among
several nonnative species which have become established within the range of
the Devils River minnow (Dionda diaboli ; Edwards 1999), a species
listed as threatened by the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, the Texas
Organization for Endangered Species (TOES 1995) and the Endangered Species
Committee of the American Fisheries Society (Williams et al. 1989).
[Additional literature
noting collection of this species from Texas locations includes, but is not
limited to the following: San Marcos River (Wallace 1984); Dolman
(1990); Rhodes and Hubbs (1992); Bosque River watershed (within Middle
Brazos River Basin; Armstrong 1998); Independence Creek (Bonner et al.
2005).]
References
Armstrong, M.P. 1998. A fishery survey of the Middle Brazos River Basin in
north-central Texas. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Arlington, Texas. 26
pp.
Bass, D.G., Jr., and V.G. Hitt. 1975. Ecological aspects of the redbreast
sunfish, Lepomis auritus, in Florida. Proc. S.E. Assoc. Game Fish.
Comm. 28:269-307.
Bonner, T.H., C. Thomas, C.S. Williams, and J.P. Karges. 2005. Temporal
assessment of a West Texas stream fish assemblage. The Southwestern
Naturalist 50(1):74-106.
Breder, C.M., Jr. 1936. The reproductive habits of the North American
sunfishes (family Centrarchidae). Zoologica 21:1-48.
Carlander, K. D. 1977. Handbook of Freshwater Fishery Biology. The Iowa
State University Press, Ames. 431 pp.
Coomer, C.E., Jr., D.R. Holder, and C.D. Swanson. 1977. A comparison of the
diets of redbreast sunfish and the spotted sucker in a coastal plain stream.
Proc. S.E. Assoc. Fish. Wildl. Agencies 31:587-596.
Cooner, R.W. and D.R. Bayne. 1982. Diet overlap in redbreast and longear
sunfishes from small streams of east-central Alabama. Proc. S.E. Assoc. Fish
Wildl. Agencies 36:106-114.
Davis, J.R. 1972. The spawning behavior, fecundity rates, and food habits of
the redbreast sunfish in southeastern North Carolina. Proc. S.E. Assoc. Game
Fish Comm. 25:556-560.
Dolman, W.B. 1990. Classification of Texas reservoirs in relation to
limnology and fish community associations. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc.
119:511-520.
Edwards, R.J. 1978. The effect of hypolimnion reservoir releases on fish
distribution and species diversity. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 107(1):71-77.
Edwards, R.J. 1999. Ecological profiles for selected stream-dwelling Texas
freshwater fishes II. Report to the Texas Water Development Board. 69 pp.
Edwards, R.J., and S. Contreras-Balderas. 1991. Historical changes in the
Ichthyofauna of the lower Rio Grande (Rio Bravo del Norte), Texas and
Mexico. The Southwestern Naturalist 36(2):201-212.
Eschmeyer, W.N. 1990. Catalog of the genre of recent fishes. California
Academy of Sciences, San Francisco.
Flemer, D.A. and W.S. Woolcott. 1966. Food habits and distribution of the
fishes of Tuckahoe Crook, Virginia, with special emphasis on the bluegill,
Lepomis m. macrochirus Rafinesque. Chesapeake Sci. 7(2): 75-89.
Garrett, G.P., R.J. Edwards, and C. Hubbs. 2004. Discovery of a new
population of Devils River minnow (Dionda diaboli), with implications
for conservation of the species. The Southwestern Naturalist 49(4):435-441.
Gerald, J.W. 1971. Sound production during courtship in six species of
sunfish (Centrarchidae). Evolution 25(1):75-87.
Goldstein, R.M., and T.P. Simon. 1999. Toward a united definition of guild
structure for feeding ecology of North American freshwater fishes. pp.
123-202 in T.P. Simon, editor. Assessing the sustainability and
biological integrity of water resources using fish communities. CRC Press,
Boca Raton, Florida. 671 pp.
Harrell, H.L. 1978. Response of the Devils River (Texas) fish community to
flooding. Copeia 1978(1):60-68.
Hellier, T.R., Jr. 1967. The fishes of the Santa Fe River system. Bull. Fla.
State Mus. Biol. Ser. 2(1):1-46.
Hoffman, G.L. 1967. Parasites of North American Freshwater Fishes.
University of California Press, Berkeley. 486 pp.
Hubbs, C., R.J. Edwards, and G.P. Garrett. 1991. An annotated checklist of
the freshwater fishes of Texas, with keys to identification of species.
Texas Journal of Science, Supplement 43(4):1-56.
Levine, D.S., A.G. Eversole, and H.A. Loyacano. 1986. Biology of redbreast
sunfish in beaver ponds. Proc. S.E. Assoc. Fish Wildl. Agencies 40:216-226.
Lee, D.S. 1980. Lepomis auritus (Linnaeus), redbreast sunfish, p. 590
in D. S. Lee, et al. Atlas of North American Fishes. N. C. State
Mus. Nat. Hist., Raleigh, i-r+854 pp.
Mabee, P.M. 1993. Phylogenetic interpretation of ontogenetic change: sorting
out the actual and artefactual in an empirical case study of centrarchid
fishes. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 107:175-291.
Mettee, M.F., P.E. O'Neil, J.M. Peterson, and R.D. Suttkus. 1996. Fishes of
Alabama and the Mobile Basin. Oxmoor House, Birmingham, AL. 820 pp.
Miller, H.C. 1964. The behavior of the pumpkinseed sunfish, Lepomis
gibbosus (Linnaeaus), with notes on the behavior of other species of
Lepomis and the pigmy sunfish, Elassoma evergladei. Behaviour 22:
88-151.
Rhodes, K., and C. Hubbs. 1992. Recovery of Pecos River fishes from a red
tide fish kill. The Southwestern Naturalist 37(2):178-187.
Richmond, N. 1940. Nesting of the sunfish, Lepomis auritus
(Linnaeus), in tidal waters. Zoologica 25(3):329-330.
Ross, S.T. 2001. The Inland Fishes of Mississippi. University Press of
Mississippi, Jackson. 624 pp.
TOES. 1995. Endangered, threatened, and watch list of Texas vertebrates, 4th
revision. Publ. 10, Texas Organization for Endangered Species, Austin. 22
pp.
Underwood, H.T., and N.O. Dronen, Jr. 1984. Endohelminths of fishes from the
upper San Marcos River, Texas. The Southwestern Naturalist 29(4):377-385.
Wainwright, P.C., and G.V. Lauder. 1992. The evolution of feeding biology in
sunfishes (Centrarchidae). pp. 472-491. In: Mayden, R.L. (ed.). 1992.
Systematics, Historical Ecology, and North American Freshwater Fishes.
Stanford University Press, Stanford, California. 969 pp.
Wallace, S.A. 1984. The food habits of redbreast sunfish in the San Marcos
River, Texas. M.S. Thesis, Southwest Texas State University, San Marcos. 59
pp.
Warren, M.L., Jr., B.M. Burr, S.J. Walsh, H.L. Bart, Jr., R.C. Cashner, D.A.
Etnier, B.J. Freeman, B.R. Kuhajda, R.L. Mayden, H.W. Robison, S.T. Ross,
and W.C. Starnes. 2000. Diversity, Distribution, and Conservation status of
the native freshwater fishes of the southern United States. Fisheries
25(10):7-29.
Williams, J.E., J.E. Johnson, D.A. Hendrickson, S. Contreras-Balderas, J.D.
Williams, M. Navarro-Mendoza, D.E. McAllister, and J.E. Deacon. 1989. Fishes
of North America endangered, threatened, or of special concern: 1989.
Fisheries 14(6):2-20.
|